Trek of the Great White Shark

I’ve neglected this blog for awhile now, and I apologize if you’ve been checking it. There’s only so much media somebody can be social for. Let me make it up a little with another episode of Where in the World is Mary Lee? The restless two-ton great white shark is now south of Bermuda in the deep ocean, after last visiting the Lowcountry, cruising up to the summer feeding grounds off New England, wandering off  the edge of the Continental Shelf and apparently liking it out there.

Genie, her not-so-much-smaller-that-it would-matter-to-you fellow great white, last pinged a surfacing signal in January, when she was off the South Carolina coast. She hasn’t been heard from since.

Meanwhile, Ocearch, the group that tagged both sharks, has mounted an expedition off Florida to find a few more. Reporters are along for that 10-day trip and you can follow it on the Ocearch Facebook page. Enjoy.

So, still think you’re in charge of stuff around here?

courtesy of Duke News:

DURHAM, NC — Marsh plants, far from being passive wallflowers, are “secret gardeners” that actively engineer their landscape to increase their species’ odds of survival, says a team of scientists from Duke University and the University of Padova in Italy. 

Scientists have long believed that the distribution of plants within a marsh is a passive adaption in which species grow at different elevations because that’s where conditions like soil aeration and salinity best meet their needs. 

But this team found intertidal marsh plants in Italy’s famed Venetian lagoon were able to subtly tune, or adjust, their elevations by producing different amounts of organic soil, and trapping and accumulating different amounts of inorganic sediments as part of a complex interplay with the environment.

“Our study identifies the visible signature of a two-way feedback occurring between the vegetation and the landscape,” said Marco Marani, professor of ecohydrology at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment and Pratt School of Engineering. “Each species builds up the elevation of its substrate to within a favorable range for its survival, much the way corals in the animal kingdom do.”

The finding may help scientists better predict marsh ecosystems’ resilience to climatic changes such as sea level rise.

“Obviously, this is not a conscious choice on the part of the plants,” Marani said. “It’s a natural mechanism — how marshes work. We just didn’t understand it in such detail until now.” 

The study appears this week in the early online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The team used numerical modeling to visualize the dynamic interactions of marsh ecosystems over time, and tested the models against detailed topographical surveys of elevations and distributions of plant species in the Venetian lagoon. 

“We’ve been studying this same marsh for 15 years and, as in similar studies around the world, we were using GPS technology with an accuracy of plus or minus one centimeter in elevation,” Marani explained. For the new study, they used a more precise surveying instrument, an electronic theodolite, which measure elevations accurately to within less than one millimeter. “It allowed us to observe differences so subtle that they went unnoticed before,” he said. 

The differences in substrate-building capabilities between species are often minute, but they allow each species to stabilize the soil within different stable states, or layers, in the marsh.  Some species prefer elevations at or below mean sea level; others prefer higher elevations that are less often inundated.

“Interestingly, our models and surveys show that plants make trade-offs when colonizing within their preferential ranges,” Marani said. “Entire sections of a species’ vegetation patch often are located above the elevation needed for its maximum biomass productivity.” This gives it a bit of margin to compensate for external fluctuations, such as the rates of relative sea level rise or sediment availability.

“Essentially,” he said, “the species hedges its bet by trading maximum productivity for greater long-term stability.”

Scientists have long known that biodiversity plays an important role in a marsh ecosystem’s long-term health and survival, “but this paper provides a clear causal link suggesting how and why,” he said. “The take-home message is that the more species you have colonizing different levels within a marsh, the more resilient to abrupt change the marsh as a whole will be.”

He said that marshes in which an invasive species, such as cordgrass, has pushed out other species will be less resilient to climatic changes.

Marani’s co-authors on the new study are Cristina Da Lio and Andrea D’Alpaos of the University of Padova, Italy.

###

Pacific quake/tsunami has Charleston lesson

 

A magnitude 8.0 earthquake struck off the Santa Cruz Islands in the Pacific Wednesday morning local time, kicking up a thee-foot tsunami that killed six people. There are two small lessons for temblor-prone Charleston here. First, the tsunami was relatively small but still lethal. Tsunamis are rare here, but large fault zones in the Atlantic are capable of kicking one up, and tide gauges in Charleston Harbor have recorded several very small tsunamis, according to the Lowcountry Hazards Center at College of Charleston. Second, the Pacific quake was preceded by what seismologists call a “swarm” of magnitude 6 quakes. Seismologists at the college had been monitoring the Santa Cruz Islands since the swarm began in late January. Whether or when swarms indicate a major quake is on its way remains a keen interest among scientists hoping to predict the big ones. But swarms routinely occur without major quakes occurring, and major quakes occur without foreshocks. All researchers can say so far is that the probability of a quake increases when a swarm occurs. Worth pointing out that the devastating Great Charleston Earthquake of 1886 was preceded by a five-day swarm of 10, much smaller magnitude 2-3 range shocks. That earthquake has been estimated at magnitude of 7 or greater.